| were
Cyclin D1-positive. This positive Cyclin D1
expression was inversely associated with tumor
stage, grade (Fig 2, 4), solid configura-tion
and positive metastases. Cyclin D1 positivity
was seen in 54% of T1 and in 23% of muscle-invasive
(T2 - 4) tumors (P<0.01). Cyclin D1 was
positive in 71% of low-grade tumors and in
18% of high-grade tumors, thus showing a statistically
significant difference (P<0.001). Most
strikingly, Cyclin D1- positive expression
was noted in 20/41(49%) papillary tumors com-pared
to only 4/29 (14%) solid tumors (P<0.01).
On the other hand, Cyclin D1 positivity did
not correlate with distant meta-stases (P>0.1)
(Table 3).
DISCUSSION
this study, in agreement with previously
published data on CD 44 expression2, 9,
23, we found a statistically significant
correlation between progressive loss of
CD 44 immuno-reactivity and increasing tumor
grade, stage and positive metastases. Lipponen
et al.23 found a positive correlation of
CD 44 to nodal metastases but not to distant
metastases. Others have recently shown a
significant asso-ciation between CD 44 immunoreactivity
and clinical outcome2, 23. The correlation
of CD 44 expression with stage and grade
can be explained on the grounds that CD
44 plays a definite role in cell-cell and
cell-matrix inter-actions8. Thus, its down-regulation
would facili-tate loss of cell-cell cohesion,
detachment from the basement membrane and
subsequent infiltration of the underlying
tissues18. It has been stated that the initial
rise and subsequent fall of CD 44 expression
during tumor pro-gression, which is documented
in the present study and has been reported
by others9,18, 23, indicates that even in
more advanced deeply invasive carcinomas
the regulation of this gene can still be
affected by the microenvironment surrounding
the cell9.
The
progressive decrease in CD 44 expres-sion,
culminating in its almost complete eli-mination
in deeply invasive carcinomas, may prove
to be of interest in relation to understanding
mechanisms involved in the tumor progression
and in the regulation of synthesis of cell
surface molecules2. On the other hand, the
overexpression of CD 44 in initial stages
of tumor progression confirmed in the current
study continues to be of practical clinical
importance as it may help and facilitate
early diagnosis in exfoliated cells resulting
in a timely treatment9.
Cytokeratins
are widely used as biochemi-cal markers
of epithelial differentiation11. The findings
of the present study concur with those
recurrence in superficial bladder carcinoma.
Am J Pathol 1999, 155:1427-1432.
3.
Hukaas S, Daehlin L, Maartman-Moe H, Ulvik
NM. The long term outcome in patients with
superficial transitional cell carcinoma
of the bladder: a single-institutional experience.
BJU 1999, 83:957-963.
4.
Hong RL, Pu YS, Hsieh TS, Chu J, Lee W.
Expression of E-cadherin and exon V6-containing
isoforms of CD 44 and their prognostic values
in human transitional cell carcinoma. J
Urol 1995, 153:2025-2028.
5.
Lee R, Droller MJ. The natural history of
bladder cancer: implications of therapy.
Urol Clin North Am 2000, 27:1-13.
6.
Korkolopoulou P, Christodoulou P, Lazaris
A et al. Prognostic implications in p16/p
Rb pathway in urothelial bladder carcinoma:
A multivariate analysis including p53 expression
and proliferation markers. Eur Urol 2001,
39:167-177.
7.
Knowles MA. Molecular genetics of bladder
cancer. Br J Urol 1995, 75:57-66.
8.
Bourguignon LY, Gunja-Smith Z, Lida N, Zhu
HB, Young LJ, Muller WJ. CD 44v (3,8-10)
is involved in cytoskeleton-mediated tumor
cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase
(MMP-9) association in metastatic breast
cancer cells. J Cell Physio 1998, 176:206-215.
9.
Sugino T, Gorham H, Yoshida K et al. Progressive
loss of CD44 gene expression in invasive
bladder cancer. Am J Pathol 1996, 149:873-882.
10.
Washington K, Gottfried MR, Telen MJ. Expres-sion
of the cell adhesion molecule CD 44 in gastric
adenocarcinomas. Hum Pathol 1994, 25:1043-1049.
11.
Moll R, Lowe A, Laufer J, Franke WW. Cytokeratin
20 in human carcinomas. A new histodiagnostic
marker detected by monoclonal antibodies.
Am J Pathol 1992, 140:427-447.
12.
Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM. Cytokeratin 7 and
Cyto-keratin 20 expression in epithelial
neoplasms. A survey of 435 cases. Mod Pathol
2000, 13:962-972.
13.
Inaba T, Matsushime H, Valentine M, Roussel
MF, Sherr CJ, Look AT. Genomic organization,
chromosomal localization and independent
expres-sion of human Cyclin D genes. Genomics
1992, 13:565-574.
14.
Resnitzky D, Gossen M, Bujard H, Reed SI.
Acceleration of the G1/S phase transition
by expression of cyclins D1 and E with an
inducible system. Mol Cell Biol 1994, 14:1669-1679.
15.
Lee CC, Yamamoto S, Morimura K. Significance
of Cyclin D1 overexpression in transitional
cell car-cinoma of urinary bladder and its
correlation with histopathologic features.
Cancer 1997, 79:780.
16.
Hermanek P, Sobin LH. UICC-International
Union Against Cancer, TNM Classification
of Malignant Tumors. 4th ed. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,
p. 135, 1987.
30. Likkonen T, Lipponen P, Raitanen M et
al. Evaluation of p21 and cyclin D1 expression
in the progression of superficial bladder
cancer. Urol Res 2000, 28:285-292.
All
correspondence to be sent to:
Ashraf
M.S. Shahin, M.D.
Urology Department
Faculty of Medicine
Zagazig University
Zagazig
Egypt
Ashrf1959@hotmail.com
|
|
evaluation
and clinical staging, the diagnosis mostly
carries significant consequences. Also it
is well known that morphologically similar
tu-mors presenting in any assigned stage,
mainly early superficial neoplasms, may behave
in a radically different fashion. This fact
seriously hampers the ability to accurately
predict clinical behaviour in a given case5.
Patients
with non-invasive urothelial neo-plasms
are most often treated conservatively and
have a protracted clinical course that requires
a close clinical follow-up. It is, thus,
useful to identify reliable prognostic para-meters
that would stratify patients at a higher
risk of recurrence and/or progression of
the disease18. On the other hand, patients
with muscle-invasive disease may benefit
from the use of markers that predict a tumor's
meta-static potentials and the outcome of
therapy21.
Histopathologic
staging alone is now reco-gnized as inadequate
for the precise charac-
of others18, 24 who have demonstrated that
in a normal urothelium, in contrast to CD
44 expression which shows intense membrane
staining only of the basal layers, CK 20
is occasionally expressed only in terminally
differentiated umbrella cells. Also in this
study we observed that CK 20 showed stronger
and consistent immunoreactivity in high-grade,
less differentiated invasive tumors, thus
confirming the results of others24 -26.
In
the current study we observed that the inverse
staining pattern of CD 44 and CK 20 in the
normal urothelium was also maintained in
neoplastic lesions. This may be explained
on the grounds that CD 44 cytoplasmic tail
interacts with underlying cytoskeleton pro-teins27,
however, the complete molecular rela-tionship
between both markers needs further study
at the molecular level that is beyond the
scope of the present study.
In
this study, the expression of Cyclin D1
was inversely related to tumor stage, grade
and positive metastasis, which is at variance
with the findings of Osman et al.28, but
in accordance with the results of Bringuier
et al.29, Lee et al.15 and Liukkonen30.
It is worth to be noticed that the Osman
et al.28 cohort in-cluded squamous cell
carcinoma with bilhar-zias as an aetiological
factor and it consisted mainly of muscle-infiltrating
tumors. Our results support the results
of Wagner et al.31 that sug-gest that the
low frequency of Cyclin D1 positivity in
advanced stage and high-grade tumors is
largely driven by a strong association between
Cyclin D1 expression with papillary tumor
growth. The significance of this observa-tion
in correlation to survival needs to be fur-ther
confirmed by others in an extensive work.
It
is worth to mention that the discrepancies
observed in the results of different studies
of biological markers used can be correlated
to patient selection bias and lack of standard
immunohistochemical assays including differ-ent
properties of the antibodies used23.
REFERENCES
1.
Kubota Y, Miyamoto H, Noguchi S et al. The
loss of retinoblastoma gene in association
with c-myc and transforming growth factor-B1
gene expression in human bladder cancer.
J Urol 1995, 154:371-374.
2.
Toma V, Hauri D, Schmid U et al. Focal loss
of CD 44 variant protein expression is related
to
17.
Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi
FK. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee:
The World Health Organization (International
Society of Urological Pathology) Consensus
Classification of Urothelial (Transitional
Cell) Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder.
Am J Surg Pathol 1998, 22:1435-1448.
18.
Desai S, Lim SD, Jimenez RE et al. Relationship
of cytokeratin 20 and CD 44 protein expression
with WHO/ISUP grade in pTa and pT1 papillary
urothelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2000, 13:1315-1323.
19.
Gillet CE, Smith P, Gregory WM et al. Cyclin
D1 and prognosis in breast cancer. Int J
Cancer 1996, 69:92-99/
20.
Suwa Y, Takano Y, Iki M, Asakura T, Noguchi
S, Masuda M. Cyclin D1 protein overexpression
is related to tumor differentiation, but
not to tumor progression or proliferation
activity in transitional cell carcinoma
of the bladder. J Urol 1998, 160:897-900.
21.
Witjess IA, Umbas R, Debruyne FM, Schalken
JA. Expression of markers for transitional
cell carcinoma in normal bladder mucosa
in patients with bladder cancer. J Urol
1995, 154:2185-2189.
22.
Sauter G, Mihatsch M. Pussycats and baby
tigers: non-invasive (pTa) and minimally
invasive (pT1) bladder carcinoma are not
the same! J Pathol 1998, 185:339-341.
23.
Lipponen P, Aaltoma S, Kosma VM, Ala-Opas
M, Eskelinen M. Expression of CD 44 standard
and variant-v6 proteins in transitional
cell bladder tumours and their relation
to prognosis during a long-term follow-up.
J Pathol 1998, 186:157-164.
24.
McKenney JK, Desai S, Cohen C, Amin M. Discriminatory
immunohistochemical staining of urothelial
carcinoma in situ and non-neoplastic urothelium.
Am J Surg Pathol 2001, 25:1074-1078.
25.
Harnden P, Eardley I, Joyce AD, Southgate
J. Cytokeratin 20 as an objective marker
of urothelial dysplasia. BJU 1996, 78:870-875.
26.
Buchuemensky V, Klein A, Zemer R, Kessler
OJ, Zimlichman S, Nissenkorn I. Cytokeratin
20: a new marker for early detection of
bladder cell carcinoma. J Urol 1998, 160:1971-1974.
27.
Lokeshwar VB, Bourguignon LY. Post-translation
protein modification and expression of ankyrin-binding
site (s) in GP85 (Pgp-1/CD44) and its bio-synthetic
precursors during T-lymphoma mem-brane biosynthesis.
J Biol Chem 1991, 266:17983-17989.
28.
Osman I, Scher H, Zhang Z et al. Expression
of cyclin D1, but not cyclins E and A, is
related to progression in bilharzial bladder
cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1997, 3:2247-2251.
29.
Bringuier PP, Tamimi Y, Schuuring E, Schalken
J. Expression of cyclin D1 and ENS1 in bladder
tumors: relationship with 11q13 amplification.
Oncogene 1996, 12:1747-1753.
31. Wagner UR, Suess K, Luginbuhl T, Schmid
U, Ackermann D, Jordan P, Sauter G. Cyclin
D1 overexpression lacks prognostic significance
in superficial urinary bladder cancer. J
Pathol 1999, 188:44-50.
|
|