|
plate was undermined and incised in the
midline from the meatus to the tip of the
glans. The incision was carried deeply dividing
all transverse webs and exposing the underlying
corporeal bodies (Fig. 1C). When the meatus
was stenosed, the midline incision was extended
by 2 to 3 mm proximally to dilate the meatus.
The incision was extended beyond the newly
located external meatus to increase the
distance between the edges of the incision
at the new meatus site and, thus, to prevent
future stenosis.5 Deepening of the groove
is very important to yield a capacious future
urethra. The urethral plate was tubularized
over a silicon catheter 8-12 Fr. with a
con-tinuous 6/0 vicryl suture (Fig. 1D).
This appro-ximated both row areas together
and they were closed forming a layer between
the urethra and the glanular skin. The glans
was finally closed using 6/0 vicryl sutures
(Fig. 1E). The catheter was removed after
a week. The patients were followed up for
at least 6 months.
RESULTS
All
cases ended by a vertically positioned,
normal-shaped external urethral meatus.
None of the cases developed fistula (Fig.
6), however complete disruption of the repair
oc-curred in one case. This was the patient
where we did not apply penile skin degloving.
DISCUSSION
When
Zaontz described the GAP pro-edure, he stated
that it should be limited to boys with a
wide, deep glanular groove and a
postoperative day. (b) Regions of increased
fibroblastic activity were observed in the
sub-epithelial stroma below the incised
area on the third postoperative day. Early
collagen depo-sition was noted in these
areas. (c) These areas appeared to organize
by the 21st postoperative day. There was
little evidence of increased fibroblastic
activity or excess colla-gen deposition.
They concluded that urethral healing after
incision and tubularization over a catheter
occurred through normal re-epithe-lialization
without excess collagen deposition or scarring11.
This
study disapproves the assumption of Holland
and Smith that incising the urethral plate
has no role in increasing the final urethral
diameter. They believe that the preoperative
depth of the urethral plate is crucial,
as a shallow preoperative plate will lead
to fistula formation12. According to Lopes
et al. re-epithelialization was shown and
the justification of an indwelling catheter
for more than 5 days until complete epithelialization
of the plate was proven11.
The
only case with glandular disruption in our
study was due to ignoring degloving of the
penile skin that alleviates tension from
suture lines. Therefore, we recommend strongly
not to ignore this step.
The
operation was easy to perform and less time
consuming than the original Snodgrass. The
best results can be achieved when the procedure
is applied in redo and in circumcised cases.
A larger series is needed to further prove
its feasibility.
REFERENCES
1.
Snodgrass W. Tubularized incised urethral
plate urethroplasty. J Urol 1994, 151:464.
All correspondence to be sent to:
M.O.
Badreldin, M.D.
Urology Department
Menofeya University
Egypt
Phone:
010-1413411
|
|
non-compliant
urethra. We decided to combine the GAP and
the TIUP procedures because it is easier
to close the glans and then dissect the
glandular wings. Moreover, the midline incision
of the urethral plate turned it deep and
wide and it, thus, became suitable for the
Zaontz glanuloplasty. The closure of the
glans in 2 layers gave support to the glans
and sepa-rated the skin from the tubularized
plate. Con-sequently, the use of a dartos
flap to cover the urethral plate, as described
in the original Snodgrass procedure, in
order to decrease the fistula rate is not
necessary any more. The criticism of the
Snodgrass procedure was directed towards
the use of a dorsal sub-cutaneous flap to
prevent fistula formation, as this could
lead to torsion of the penis and compromise
vascularity of the dorsal skin9 and a regular
dilatation to prevent distal stenosis10.
Applying our modification in the form of
combining the GAP procedure and extending
the midline incision above the level of
the new external meatus renders such criticism
irrele-vant. Also, discarding the use of
a dartos flap reduced the operation time
considerably. Ex-cellent results were obtained
in the recurrent cases. This finding was
supported by Borer et al.6 and Hayashi et
al7. We believe that the procedure will
alleviate the fear from those cases, especially
during the early learning curve of the surgeon.
In
an animal study done by Lopes et al. in
2001, they did a midline incision in the
urethral plate and tubularized it around
a catheter. They showed that: (a) migration
of the epi-thelial cells was evident on
the second post-operative day with an apparent
complete re-epithelialization around the
catheter by the 5th
2. Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni B, Hurwitz
R, Caldamone A, Erlich R. Tubularized incised
urethral plate repair for proximal hypospadius.
J Urol 1996, 159:2129.
3.
Lorenzo AG, Snodgrass WT. Regular dilatation
is unnecessary after tabularized incised
plate hypospadias repair. BJU Int 2002,
89:94-97.
4.
Guralnick ML, Al-Shammari A, Williot PE,
Leonard MP. Outcome of hypospadius repair
using tabularized incised plate urethroplasty.
Can J Urol 2000, 7:986-991.
5.
Kheirallah M, Badreldin MO. Distal hypospadius
repair with tabularized incised urethral
plate: Results, complications and management.
Men Med J 2000, 12:146-150.
6.
Borer SG, Bauer SB, Peters CA, Diamond DA,
Attala A, Cilento BG Jr., Retik AB. Tubularized
incised plate urethroplasty. Expanded use
in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias.
J Urol 2001, 165:581-585.
7.
Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K et al. Tubularized
incised plate urethroplasty for secondary
hypo-spadias surgery. Int J Urol 2001, 8:444-448.
8.
Zaontz MR. The GAP (Glans Approximation
Procedure) for glanular/coronal hypospadias.
J Urol 1989, 141:359-361.
9.
Ross JH, Kay R. Use of deepithelialized
local skin flap in hypospadius repair accomplished
by tubu-larization of the incised plate.
Urology 1997, 50:110.
10.
Elbakrey A. Tubularized incised urethral
plate urethroplasty: is regular dilatation
necessary for success? BJU Int 1999, 84:78.
11.
Lopes JF, Schned A, Ellsworth PI, Cendron
M. Histological analysis of urethral healing
after tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.
J Urol 2001, 166:633.
12. Holland AJ, Smith GH. Effect of depth
and width of the urethral plate on tabularized
incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 2000, 164:489-491.
|
|